Felt Vs. Synthetic Underlayment

As the saying goes, “A good roof is like a strong foundation for a house.” When it comes to roofing materials, underlayment plays a crucial role in protecting the structural integrity of a roof. Two popular options for underlayment are felt and synthetic materials. Inside this article, our roofing contractors provide an objective analysis of the pros and cons of both felt and synthetic underlayment, along with factors that should be considered when choosing between them.

Felt underlayment has been used for decades and has established itself as a reliable choice. It offers excellent durability, moisture resistance, and thermal insulation. However, it can be prone to tearing during installation and may not provide optimal protection against wind-driven rain.

On the other hand, synthetic underlayment is gaining popularity due to its superior strength, tear resistance, and enhanced water resistance. It also tends to be lighter in weight compared to felt underlayment. However, synthetic options can be more expensive than traditional felt products.

When deciding between felt and synthetic underlayment, important factors such as climate conditions, budget constraints, and local building codes must be taken into account. By understanding the advantages and disadvantages of each option, homeowners can make an informed decision about which type of underlayment best suits their specific needs.

Pros and Cons of Felt Underlayment

The advantages and disadvantages of felt underlayment can be explored to gain a comprehensive understanding of its merits and drawbacks. Felt underlayment is known for its ease of installation process, making it a popular choice among homeowners. It is relatively simple to cut and lay down, allowing for efficient installation. Additionally, felt underlayment tends to be less expensive compared to synthetic alternatives. This makes it an attractive option for those on a tight budget or looking to save costs during the roofing process. 

However, there are some downsides to consider. Felt underlayment has a shorter lifespan compared to synthetic materials, which may require more frequent replacements in the long run. Furthermore, it is not as resistant to moisture and water infiltration as synthetic options, potentially leading to issues such as mold growth or rotting beneath the roof surface. Overall, while felt underlayment offers affordability and easy installation, it may not provide the same level of durability and protection as synthetic alternatives.

Pros and Cons of Synthetic Underlayment

Considering its merits and demerits, one can weigh the advantages and disadvantages of using a modern alternative to traditional roofing materials, such as synthetic underlayment. Synthetic underlayment offers several advantages over felt underlayment. 

Firstly, it is highly durable and resistant to tears, ensuring long-lasting protection for the roof. Secondly, it is lightweight and easy to handle during installation, reducing labor costs and time. Thirdly, synthetic underlayment has superior waterproofing properties compared to felt underlayment, preventing water infiltration and potential damage to the roof structure. 

Besides that, it provides better UV resistance, reducing the risk of color fading or degradation over time. However, one must also consider the disadvantages of synthetic underlayment. It tends to be more expensive than felt underlayment and may not be suitable for all types of roofs due to specific installation requirements or compatibility issues with certain roofing materials.

Factors to Consider When Choosing Underlayment

When selecting underlayment for a roofing project, it is crucial to take into account various factors that can impact the overall performance and longevity of the roof. One important factor to consider is cost-effectiveness comparison. 

Felt underlayment tends to be less expensive than synthetic underlayment, making it a more cost-effective option for budget-conscious homeowners or contractors. However, synthetic underlayment often offers superior durability and longevity compared to felt underlayment.

Synthetic materials are typically more resistant to tear, moisture, and UV damage, which can result in a longer lifespan for the roof. Synthetic underlayment is usually lighter in weight and easier to install than felt underlayment. 

Overall, when considering the factors of cost-effectiveness and durability/longevity assessment, it is essential to weigh these options carefully to determine the best choice for a specific roofing project.


Get a Free Estimate!

Please fill out this quick form, and we will contact you as soon as possible.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Get a Free Estimate!

Please fill out this quick form, and we will contact you as soon as possible.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.